IMPACTS OF THE NORTH PACIFIC CURRENT ON SALMON PRODUCTIVITYDecember 27, 2017
Malick MJ, SP Cox, FJ Mueter, B Dorner, and RM Peterman. 2016. Effects of the North Pacific Current on the productivity of 163 Pacific salmon stocks. Fisheries Oceanography 26:268-281.
In a nutshell
- The North Pacific Current (NPC) traverses the Pacific Ocean in an easterly direction, bifurcating into the Alaska and California currents as it nears the west coast of North America
- NPC properties are not constant, however; current width, flow rate, and bifurcation latitude, among other factors, can vary substantially from year to year
- Here, researchers examined the effects of changes in bifurcation latitude and current flow rate on the productivity of pink, chum, and sockeye stocks along the North American coast
- Variations in these properties were found to have significantly different effects on salmon productivity depending on stock location and salmon species; changes in these NPC characteristic had a far greater influence on the productivity of southern stocks than northern stocks, and sockeye responded to shifts in bifurcation latitude, whereas chum and pink salmon were more sensitive to changes in flow rate
- The results of this study improve our understanding of the roles horizontal ocean transport pathways such as the NPC play in the population dynamics of Pacific salmon
In this study, a team of researchers led by Michael Malick of Simon Fraser University examined how shifts in the latitudinal location (north-south) of the BI and the NPC flow rate (represented by NPGO intensity) affected the productivity of 163 pink, chum, and sockeye salmon stocks along the west coast of North America over a 35-year time frame. Stocks were segregated both by species and by location (Washington, Alaska, and British Columbia), thus extending over a geographical range encompassing the Bering Sea, the Gulf of Alaska, and the greater part of the Pacific Northwest coast. Changes in both the BI and NPGO were found to significantly enhance the productivity of salmon stocks in Washington and British Columbia regardless of species, with all stocks in these locations benefiting from a northward-shifted BI and a relatively high rate of NPC flow. At the species level, however, the NPGO had a much stronger effect (over two times larger) on pink and chum salmon productivity in these regions than did the BI, whereas the north-south location of the BI was considerably more important (by ~2.4 times) for sockeye salmon than was the rate of current flow. Most notably, there was a clear geographical distinction between southern and northern stocks, as variations in BI and NPGO had little effect on the productivity of Alaskan salmon stocks.
The authors concluded that temporal shifts in these two fundamental properties of the NPC had a strong influence on the productivity dynamics of the more southerly populations of pink, chum, and sockeye salmon, but not on the productivity of northern stocks, indicating that the population dynamics of salmon in the Gulf of Alaska and the Bering Sea are largely dependent on other environmental factors.
Science Spotlight by Ken Ferguson